aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_enhancement_request.yaml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_enhancement_request.yaml')
-rw-r--r--.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_enhancement_request.yaml108
1 files changed, 108 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_enhancement_request.yaml b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_enhancement_request.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..93be44112
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_enhancement_request.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+name: Feature Enhancement Request
+description: I want to make an existing feature better
+labels: ["type=enhancement"]
+body:
+ - type: markdown
+ attributes:
+ value: >
+ Filing feature requests is one of the most popular ways to contribute to Guava.
+
+
+ Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
+ a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our
+ users indicates that they really appreciate Guava's high power-to-weight ratio. It's
+ important to us to keep Guava as easy to use and understand as we can. That means boiling
+ features down to compact but powerful abstractions, and controlling feature bloat carefully.
+
+ - type: textarea
+ attributes:
+ label: API(s)
+ description: Which existing classes or methods do you want to improve?
+ placeholder: e.g., `com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList::of`
+ render: java
+ validations:
+ required: true
+
+ - type: textarea
+ attributes:
+ label: How do you want it to be improved?
+ validations:
+ required: true
+
+ - type: textarea
+ attributes:
+ label: Why do we need it to be improved?
+ validations:
+ required: true
+
+ - type: textarea
+ attributes:
+ label: Example
+ description: >
+ Please provide an example usage of the feature that would be different with the improvement.
+ render: java
+ validations:
+ required: true
+
+ - type: textarea
+ attributes:
+ label: Current Behavior
+ description: What does the feature currently do?
+ validations:
+ required: true
+
+ - type: textarea
+ attributes:
+ label: Desired Behavior
+ description: What do you want it to do instead?
+ validations:
+ required: true
+
+ - type: markdown
+ attributes:
+ value: >
+ Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
+ it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?
+
+
+ Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
+ that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the
+ real-world use case so the community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually
+ the *best* way to address the real use case, or whether or not a different approach might be
+ more appropriate.
+
+
+ It's okay if you can't provide complete context on a use case. We understand if you are not
+ able to discuss the full details of what you're working on.
+
+
+ But Guava aims to provide functionality that is useful across boundaries of projects,
+ companies, or even industries — utilities useful for a sizable proportion of all Java
+ programmers everywhere. If you can give enough detail such that any of us can imagine coming
+ across a similar need in our own work, that's extremely helpful in studying how broadly
+ useful the proposed change will be.
+
+ - type: textarea
+ attributes:
+ label: Concrete Use Cases
+ description: Please provide use cases that actually came up in the real world.
+ validations:
+ required: true
+
+ - type: checkboxes
+ attributes:
+ label: Checklist
+ options:
+ - label: >
+ I agree to follow the
+ [code of conduct](https://github.com/google/.github/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
+ required: true
+ - label: >
+ I have read and understood the [contribution
+ guidelines](https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/HowToContribute#feature-requests).
+ required: true
+ - label: >
+ I have read and understood
+ [Guava's philosophy](https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/PhilosophyExplained), and
+ I strongly believe that this proposal aligns with it.
+ required: true