From 7ff9fd955e1bb9b3598550efaa896b5c4b1a9cd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bob Badour Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:49:57 -0800 Subject: [LSC] Add LOCAL_LICENSE_KINDS to external/python/futures Added SPDX-license-identifier-Apache-2.0 SPDX-license-identifier-PSF-2.0 to: Android.bp Bug: 68860345 Bug: 151177513 Bug: 151953481 Test: m all Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: janitorial work Change-Id: I978c3339c8bc703e0b744b3e977431498cca5b8a --- Android.bp | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Android.bp b/Android.bp index 16adbfb..b85574c 100644 --- a/Android.bp +++ b/Android.bp @@ -12,6 +12,36 @@ // See the License for the specific language governing permissions and // limitations under the License. +package { + default_applicable_licenses: ["external_python_futures_license"], +} + +// Added automatically by a large-scale-change that took the approach of +// 'apply every license found to every target'. While this makes sure we respect +// every license restriction, it may not be entirely correct. +// +// e.g. GPL in an MIT project might only apply to the contrib/ directory. +// +// Please consider splitting the single license below into multiple licenses, +// taking care not to lose any license_kind information, and overriding the +// default license using the 'licenses: [...]' property on targets as needed. +// +// For unused files, consider creating a 'fileGroup' with "//visibility:private" +// to attach the license to, and including a comment whether the files may be +// used in the current project. +// See: http://go/android-license-faq +license { + name: "external_python_futures_license", + visibility: [":__subpackages__"], + license_kinds: [ + "SPDX-license-identifier-Apache-2.0", + "SPDX-license-identifier-PSF-2.0", + ], + license_text: [ + "LICENSE", + ], +} + python_library { name: "py2-futures", srcs: [ @@ -19,4 +49,3 @@ python_library { ], defaults: ["py2_only"], } - -- cgit v1.2.3